Dancer and writer Parvathi Ramanathan looks at the individual and the ensemble in contemporary dance practice
I woke up tormented by the feelings of having lost a choreographic phrase from my dream. I realised the past week of watching dance at the Attakkalari India Biennial was satisfying. It’s a mark of success that a contemporary dance festival excites one to move, to generate ideas (even in one’s dreams!), inspires one to find associations with other forms of creative expression, and builds a community. The ten days of the Biennial treated Bangalore to a wide range of performances that propose different kinds of choreographic interventions.
Of the Centre Stage performances of the Biennial, seven were ensemble works, with five or more dancers on stage. My observations of the negotiation between the individual and the group in these works helped me notice a transformation in contemporary dance’s approach to ensemble works.
During my training in Bharatanatyam as well as during my stint in a Bollywood-style dance company in Mumbai, the approach to dancing in an ensemble was very precise—we had to look identical and coordinated, and look extraordinary while doing all of that. Watching a video recording of dancers from Kalakshetra execute a clean thillana, I remember being mesmerised by the perfect coordination they’d achieved and the way every angle of their limbs marked equal arcs. Even for the commercial stage shows in Mumbai, our incessant rehearsals were always meant to work towards perfectly looking identical, and pulsating as a common large body of energy on stage—what is otherwise called, to be faadoo.
Some of the performances at the Biennial brought up questions around the machinations, executions, and making of ensemble work in contemporary practice. Some works allowed us to recognise the individual voices in the collective, others built on personal signatures within in an ensemble, and still others were groups clearly made up of many individuals.
In Canadian Compagnie Marie Chouinard’s 24 Preludes by Chopin and The Rite of Spring the personal signatures of the individual dancers stood prominently within the ensemble works. The dancers were all clearly embedded in the ballet form and had bodies moulded by the same principles during training. While the form of the performance remained within the mores of contemporary ballet, the approach to choreography revealed the unique intention within each dancer. One of the dancers from the company shared her experience of working with Marie Chouinard, “Marie invites the voice of each dancer to express their interpretation of life—their being in the imagination, body and physicality”. Speaking specifically about the The Rite of Spring she said, “The cadency and force of the music energises and emphasises a certain part of the body, makes it alive to the music, the space and the impulse of the moment. That’s also where you see the individual expressions. There is a structure, but freedom within it to allow us to play with the timing, repetition, breathing, the pause. This then becomes exaggerated into different combinations of choreographed movement. ”
While this work is mostly comprised of solos unlike previous versions of The Rite of Spring, there are several moments when all the dancers gather on stage. Even in the cacophony that the music dredges up when the dancers run haywire and execute a choreographic phrase in random order, there is an embedded precision in the chaos.
In Preethi Athreya’s Conditions Of Carriage, which uses the simple functional act of jumping as the primary element of its choreography, the individual stood out even in their movement as a cohesive collective. During the performance, each performer calls out a number, and later, shouts out their name, drawing attention to each individual, the parts that make the whole. The work also exposes its constituent elements in its mathematical structure and mechanical negotiation of space. Athreya proposes the motion of jumping as a corporeal political act by choosing an accessible basic movement over virtuosic leaps as the seed for this performance. Watching these diverse bodies not just jumping, landing, and playing together, but also faltering, falling, sighing, and tiring together in the square pit is an interesting way to access the proscenium that betrays none of the goings-on in the wings. In an interview with Preethi, Madhushree Basu points out that Conditions Of Carriage is an internalised “personal” speaking by each of the jumpers, who use this process to communicate with their own and each other’s bodies.
In her interview with Madhushree, Preethi explained that she had to be aware of the differential readings possible with her choice in pairings in this section. She says she had to be conscious that a male-female pair might allow for sexist man-woman reading, that pairing jumpers of different heights or physicality might open itself to be interpreted as bullying. In choreographing this work, she paid attention to these dynamics and tried to avoid falling into traps of symbolism; she tried to extricate the truth of the body through the physicality of jumping.
Having seen this work being performed at various venues and cities, I’ve come to observe that this value of the personal towards the cohesiveness of the collective has certainly matured in Conditions Of Carriage. At the Biennial performance, the ‘satellite section’—a duet performed by different jumpers charging towards each other—impacted me differently. Perhaps it was the open basketball court venue that put up a vast distance between the audience and square pit and dissipated the energy emanating from the jumping pit. Having seen the work with ten bodies (there were eight in this performance), I could feel the absence of two jumping bodies.
Despite the freedom to embed the personal in the collective that contemporary dance practices, as an audience member one is often invested in how the details of choreography are perfected. Indeed, all the pillars that hold up a ceiling, upon being thumped, resonate with a different sound. But they all need to be singing different pitches of the same song.
During the Attakkalari India Biennial 2017, within the Writing on Dance Laboratory, we had several conversations about dance—its making, its reception, its impact, its sensations, its politics. Watching every performance at the festival, and attending conferences, screenings, and other festival events, the Lab participants received a broad view of festival happenings. That holistic perspective and those many conversations are reflected in Ligament’s final issue on the Attakkalari India Biennial 2017. Through the each of the participants’ different experiences of different events, we are left with pertinent questions about dance that might be worth considering after the festival has ended, through all the dance we watch in days to come. Why do we watch dance? Why should we write on dance? Are there many ways to write? And when dance makes us feel something, anything, what questions do we ask of it?
— Poorna Swami, Editor
Dancer and writer Dayita Nereyeth broadly traces the choreographic legacy of Igor Stravinsky’s The Rite of Spring and her relationship with it
Dance writer and producer Ian Abbott considers the edges of touch, authenticity, and repetition in two performances
Dance and writer Parvathi Ramanathan looks at the individual and the ensemble in contemporary dance practice
Playwright, theatre director, and performer Swar Thounaojam looks at the optics around women choreographers in contemporary dance through Centre Stage performances and a conference at the Biennial 2017
Dance researcher and PhD student Himalaya Gohel examines two works to investigate our notions of melody, music, and movement in contemporary dance
Dancers Revé Terborg, Audrey Apers and Ivan Ugrin from The Netherlands presented While We Strive, choreographed by Arno Schuitemaker, on Day 8 of the Attakkalari India Biennial 2017
Finnish choreographer-performer Ima Iduozee presented This is the Title on Day 8 of the Attakkalari India Biennial 2017
Finland’s Tero Saarinen Company presented Westward Ho!, choreographed by Tero Saarinen, on Day 8 of the Attakkalari India Biennial 2017
Finland’s Tero Saarinen presented Man In A Room on Day 8 of the Attakkalari India Biennial 2017
Chennai-based choreographer Preethi Athreya and the Jumpers presented Conditions Of Carriage on the closing day of the Attakkalari India Biennial 2017
Bangalore’s Attakkalari Repertory Company presented Isshh(क), choreographed by Swiss choreographer Nicole Seiler, on the closing day of the Attakkalari India Biennial 2017
To pick up and run with a magazine that has had another life is never easy. There are those conflicting desires to find close continuity and to just scrap it all and start anew. Ligament 2016-17 reemerges from a half-way point. We want to build on the investigations and insights of the magazine’s past contributors and also find ways to say what they perhaps had wanted to say but could not, or forgot to, in that moment.
Ligament was founded to facilitate the articulation of an evolving language that encompasses the impulses of contemporary dance. The idea of “contemporary” is inherently bound to time, to a sense of history, rather multiple histories unfolding. In its 2016-17 iteration, we hope that Ligament can grapple with the idea of how dance might hold a place in-step with the patterns of active and forming histories, rather than remaining a canonised and pondered response to a bygone world. We’d like to embrace the immediacy of “contemporary”, and invite contributions from dancers, choreographers, arts practitioners, scholars, audience members, readers. In this way, we hope to reach for the intimacies, resistances, and fragilities that permeate the developing field of South Asian contemporary dance.
Articulating a medium as visceral, visual, and ephemeral as dance requires making connections to methods of thought and critique that lie outside evaluative language. So for Ligament 2016-17 we welcome, of course, the critical essay, but also audio, photographs, ekphrastic poems, interviews, and hybrid media of various kinds that might speak to us about dance, carefully and proximately. Like the anatomical connective tissue for which it is named, Ligament, we hope, can help us locate dance in tandem with the many bodies that produce and encapsulate it.
To those who find themselves here for the first time, welcome. And those whom we have met before, we are glad you are back.
—Poorna Swami, Editor
Get in touch with us at firstname.lastname@example.org